研究生: |
黃彥慈 Huang, Yen-Tzu |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
公益市場化:從北京草根NGOs的產業轉型探討社會治理政策的轉變 Publicity Marketization: A Study on the Change of Social Governance Policy from the Transformation of Beijing Grassroots NGOs |
指導教授: |
陳明祺
Chen, Ming-Chi |
口試委員: |
林宗弘
Lin, Thung-Hong 伍維婷 Wu, Wei-Ting |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
人文社會學院 - 社會學研究所 Institute of Sociology |
論文出版年: | 2017 |
畢業學年度: | 105 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 101 |
中文關鍵詞: | 國家-社會關係 、NGO 、組織 、資源依賴 、慈善法 |
外文關鍵詞: | state-social relationship, NGO, organization, resource dependence, Charity Law |
相關次數: | 點閱:3 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究聚焦於當代中國變遷中的國家-社會關係。當公民社會的雛形逐漸在國家主導的力量下,轉化為公益市場之後,組織的行為有哪些改變?
本文以以北京市為設定範圍,作為首都的北京,集中了全國最多的社會組織,同時也是監控最多、最接近中國中央政府所構想的治理典範。
本文從文獻回顧與具體現象推論的方式中,提出了三個看法,並以數據資料進行初步驗證,本文認為,第一,國家對社會空間的治理,仍不脫「分類控制」的限制與發展兩手策略,只是更加綿密細緻。
其次,國家的綿密化手段借用了社會組織現代化過程中,必經的同形化壓力及資源依賴兩種驅力,以擴展吸納的範圍。限制策略的仍然是對公民社會組織進行各種騷擾;發展策略則有相當進化的手段,政府拿資金打造一個穩定的公益市場,以掌握資金、媒體等資源,政府就能操縱北京市範圍內的各種議題。
本文認為公益市場化的效果,讓國家得以用營裡或非營利來判斷社會組織的脫敏程度;同時,在使用限制策略的打壓手段之前,就可以先操作資金與社會輿論,用流行讓大家專注於其他社會議題,在真正出手鎮壓之前,先行讓整個社會遺忘這些議題與組織。
然而面對結構,草根行動者也發展出接受吸納、有限度的合作、迴避等三項行動策略。
This study focuses on the state-social relationship in contemporary China. As the from of civil society transfer into a market of publicity, what would happen to the grassroot NGOs’ behavior ?
This article is based on the Beijing area. Beijing ,as the capital of China, the social organizations face the most direct monitoring. Therefore state-social relationship in Beijing, is probably the the ideal relationship central government want.
I used literature review and phenomenon to put forward three presumption in this paper. Then I use database to exam them. First presumption, the state still not off the "classify and control" policy which use restrictions and development strategies. Yet the state has make them more delicate.
Second presumption, the delicate strategies make efficient co-option leverage both isomorphic pressure and resource dependence. The restrictions strategies are nothing new but police harassment while the development strategies evolve.
The social actors however develop three kind strategies to survive too. They are being co-opted, limited cooperation, and avoidence.
(MSF), M. S. F. "MSF closed its projects in China in 2014.". from http://www.msf.org/en/where-we-work/china.
Baron de Montesquieu, C.-L. d. S. (1995[1748]). 論法的精神. 北京, 商務印書館.
Baume, S. (2012). Hans Kelsen and the Case for Democracy. UK, ECPR Press.
Casciaro, T. and M. J. Piskorski (2005). "Power Imbalance, Mutual Dependence, and Constraint Absorption: A Closer Look at Resource Dependence Theory." Administrative Science Quarterly 50(2): 167-199.
Dahl , R. A. (1999). 論民主, 聯經出版公司.
Deng, G. (2010). "The Hidden Rules Governing China"s Unregistered NGOs: Management and Consequences." The China Review 10(1): 183-206.
Denhardt, R. B. J. V. D. (2011). The New Public Service: Serving, Not Steering Routledge.
Diamond, L. J. (2002). "Thinking about Hybrid Regimes." Journal of Democracy 13(2): 21-35.
DiMaggio, P. and W. Powell (1983). "The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality inOrganizational Fields " American Sociological Review 48(2): 147-160.
Evans, P. B. (1997). Government Action, Social Capital, and Development: Reviewing the Evidence of Synergy. State-Society Synergy: Government and Social Capital in Development. P. B. Evans. California, Berkeley, University of California, Berkeley: 178-210.
Evans, P. B. (1997). Introduction: Development Strategies Across the Public-Private Divide. State-Society Synergy: Government and Social Capital in Development. Berkeley, University of California, Berkeley: 1-10.
Halper, S. (2012). The Beijing Consensus: Legitimizing Authoritarianism in Our Time New York, Basic Books.
Hintze, O. (1975). Military organization and the organization of the state. The historical essays of Otto Hintze. R. M. B. Felix Gilbert New York, Oxford University Press: 175-215.
Howell, J. (2015). " Shall we dance? Welfarist incorporation and the politics of state-labour NGO relations in China " The China Quarterly 223: 702-723.
Hsu, C. L. (2016). China Youth Development Foundation: GONGO (government-organized NGO) or GENGO (government-exploiting NGO)? NGO Governance and Management in China. R. H. J. Y. J. Hsu. UK, Routledge: 153-167.
Hsu, J. Y. J. (2016). The politics of space, state, and NGOs in China. NGO Governance and Management in China. R. H. J. Y. J. Hsu. UK, Routledge: 9-28.
Hsu, J. Y. J. R. H. (2016). Governing and managing NGOs in China: an introduction. NGO Governance and Management in China. R. H. J. Y. J. Hsu. UK, Routledge: 1-8.
Kelsen, H. (2000[1964]). The Law of the United Nations: A Critical Analysis of Its Fundamental Problems. New Jersey, The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd.: 50-52.
Lai, W., Jiangang Zhu, Lin Tao, and Anthony J. Spires. (2015). "Bounded by the State: Government Priorities and the Development of Private Philanthropic Foundations in China." The China Quarterly 224: 1083-1092.
Levitsdy and Way (2010). Idroduction. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 3-36.
Linz, J. J. (2000). Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes. Boulder, Colorado, Lynne Rienner.
McCarthy, J. D. and M. N. Zald (1977). "Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory." American Journal of Sociology 82(6): 1212-1241.
McCarthy, J. D. and M. N. Zald (1977). The Trend of Social Movements in America: Professionalization and Resource Mobilization, General Learning Press
Meyer, J. W. and B. Rowen (1977). "Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony." American Journal of Sociology 83(2): 340-363.
Migdal, J. S. (2001). The state-in-society approach: a new definition of the state and transcending the narrowly constructed world of rigor. State in Society: Studying How States and Societies Transform and Constitute One Another, Cambridge University Press: 3-38.
Migdal, J. S. (2001). STUDYING THE STATE. State in Society: Studying How States and Societies Transform and Constitute One Another, Cambridge University Press: 231-264.
Mitchell, T. (1991). "The Limits of the State: Beyond Statist Approaches and Their Critics." American Political Science Review 85(1): 75-96.
Nordlinger, E. A. (1987). Taking the state seriously. Understanding Political Development M. W. S. P. Huntington. Boston, Little, Brown,: 353-390.
Petrova, T. T., Sidney (2007). "Transactional and Participatory Activism in the Emerging European Polity." Comparative Political Studies 40(1): 74-94.
Pfeffer, J. and G. R. Salancik (2007[1978]). 組織的外部控制:資源依賴觀點, 聯經出版公司.
Przeworski, A., Alvarez, Michael E., Cheibub, Jose Antonio, and Limongi, Fernando (2000). Democracies and Dictatorships. Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950-1990. A. Przeworski. UK, Cambridge University Press: 13-36.
Sartori, G. (1970). "Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics." The American Political Science Review 64(4): 1033-1053.
Schedler, A. (2006). The Logic of Electoral Authoritarianism. Electoral Authoritarianism: The Dynamics of Unfree Competition. Boulder, Colorado, Lynne Rienner Publishers: 1-16.
Schumpeter, J. A. (2003[1942]). 資本主義、社會主義與民主, 左岸文化.
Selznick, P. (1949). TVA and the grass roots: a study in the sociology of formal organization, Berkeley, University of California Press.
Shieh, S. (2016). Mapping the dynamics of civil society in China: a modal analysis of trends in the NGO sector. NGO Governance and Management in China. UK, Routledge: 47-70.
Skocpol, T. ( 1985). Bringing the State Back In. Bringing the State Back In. P. B. R. Evans, Dietrich & Skocpol, Theda, Cambridge University Press: 3-37.
Steinberg, N. (2001). "Background Paper on GONGOs and QUANGOs and Wild NGOs." from http://www.worldfederalist.org/ACTION/ngorpt1201.html.
Wang, Z. (2013). "Blind Men and the Elephant: Why the World Misunderstands China?" China-US Focus.
Weber, M. (1978). Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Berkley, CA, University of California Press.
小毛驢市民農園. "中國發展簡報NGO名錄:小毛驢市民農園." Retrieved 9/6, 2017, from http://www.chinadevelopmentbrief.org.cn/org592/.
工友之家微信. "同心農園2017年同心桃認養方案——因為生態友愛 所以自然甜美." Retrieved 08/30, 2017, from http://www.tongxinhuhui.org/index.php/Index/article/aid/1585.html.
中致社會發展促進中心 (2014/08/29). "中致社會發展促進中心CKDP專案第二屆鄉村教師公益培訓." from http://www.weibo.com/p/2304187a6489fd0102v52l?from=page_100505_profile&wvr=6&mod=wenzhangmod
中國共青團廣東省委 (2012/03/12). "廣東省委書記汪洋對廣東共青團構建樞紐型社會組織作出重要批示." from http://www.ccyl.org.cn/place/news/guangdong/201203/t20120312_554033.htm.
中國共產黨 (2013/02/28). "中國共產黨第十八屆中央委員會第二次全體會議公報." from http://news.12371.cn/2013/02/28/VIDE1362051363403567.shtml.
中國聾人網 (2014/08/02). "中國社會福利基金會圓愛聯合勸募基金成立." from http://www.cndcm.cn/html/cisha/3164_1.html.
公益2.0项目(NGO20团队). "晏陽初平民教育發展中心機構簡介." Retrieved 4/4, 2017, from http://www.ngo20map.com/User/view/id/940.
公益時報 (2010/12/07). "徐永光:“官辦”公益去行政化是第一要務." Retrieved 12/07, 2010, from http://igongyi.cntv.cn/20101207/104309.shtml.
方冰 (2015/03/25). "為女權人士呼籲的益仁平中心遭查抄." from https://www.voachinese.com/a/yirenping-20150325/2694322.html.
父母心公益團隊 (2014/09/23). "混進羊群裡的狼——請區別政治類NGO與公益類NGO." from https://www.douban.com/note/427780917/.
王名 (2012). 陳永玲、馬延軍談95世婦會NGO婦女論壇. 中國NGO口述史(第一輯). 王名, 社會科學文獻出版社: 15-37.
王名 (2016). 方興未艾的中國公益慈善:發展、改革與趨勢. 中國基金會發展獨立研究報告(2016). 基金會中心網, 北京聯合出版公司: 68-80.
王信賢 (2006). 爭辯中的中國社會組織研究:「國家-社會」關係的視角. 臺北, 韋伯文化.
王勇 (2016). 慈善信託一兩千億,告訴你如何從中「分一杯羹」?. 公益時報. 公益時報, 公益時報微博.
王紹光 (2014). "中國的代表型民主." 中共杭州市委黨校學報(1): 4-12.
王愛雲 (2011). "試析新中國成立後我國身份社會的形成及其影響." 中共黨史研究(12).
北京佑安愛心家園 (2011/11/05). "佑安愛心家園會員手冊."
立人鄉村圖書館理事會 (2014/09/19). "中國發展簡報網站NGO新聞:立人鄉村圖書館關於停止運營的公開信." from http://www.chinadevelopmentbrief.org.cn/news-16604.html.
曲晨 (2016/04/04/). "美麗新世界的誕生:公益的黃昏——公益市場化現象與思潮批判." from http://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=MzA3NjgwMjE3NA==&mid=403303528&idx=1&sn=7614e87f03097a27f7f7c88338e5e595&scene=21#wechat_redirect.
竹立家 (2014). "國家治理體系重構與治理能力現代化." 中共杭州市委黨校學報(1): 19-21.
吳天適 (2016/12/22). ""十八大以來這四年”之一:習近平的改革時間摸著石頭過河與頂層設計並重." 十八大以來這四年. from http://www.infzm.com/content/121677.
吳阿侖 (2013/10/21). "何道峰:社會市場化勢不可擋." from http://www.icixun.com/2013/1021/2602_4.html.
邢成 (2017). 《慈善法》下如何定位公益信託展業前景. 當代金融家.
周雪光 (2009). 組織社會學十講. 北京, 社會科學文獻出版社.
岳金柱 (2017). "政府購買社會組織服務實踐探索與創新研究——以北京市社會建設專項資金購買社會組織服務為例." 行政管理改革(2).
林吉洋 (2017/06/21). "【公民社會的沉寂】市場化或是公益化? 中國公益行業走向的世代論戰." from http://e-info.org.tw/node/205695.
紅氣球 (2017/03/04). "【國際婦女節專題】國內知名微博帳號《女權之聲》被禁言30天 女權人士堅守發聲陣地." from https://www.inmediahk.net/node/1048052.
致誠公益 (2016/02/17). "關於我們(北京致誠社會組織矛盾調處與研究中心)." from http://www.zhongzhingo.org/a/aboutus/2014/0904/2.html
范春旭、郭延冰 (2015/11/05). "公益律师佟丽华:帮农民工讨174元用了3年." from http://www.bjnews.com.cn/news/2015/11/05/383095.html.
倪顥芸 (2014). 控制與吸納:北京市政府向社會組織購買公共服務分析. 東亞研究所, 國立政治大學.
唐睿、李韻 (2013/05/08). "披露馬三家酷刑黑幕 《Lens》雜誌被註銷刊號." from https://www.ntdtv.com/xtr/b5/2013/05/08/a894108.html.
徐永光 (2016/05/16). "徐永光:公益要去行政化、去道德化,不可去市场化." from http://www.chinadevelopmentbrief.org.cn/news-18581.html.
時憲民 (1993). "中國社會轉型期的結構分化與雙二元社會結構." 中國社會科學季刊(5): 55-56.
能源基金會(美國)北京辦事處. "中國發展簡報NGO名錄:能源基金會(美國)北京辦事處." Retrieved 8/30, 2017, from http://www.chinadevelopmentbrief.org.cn/org72/.
高瑜 (2014). “馬三家”酷刑甚於渣滓洞. 明鏡月刊. 42.
健康報 (2013/10/15). "北京佑安愛心家園 舉辦“一訪三互動” 教育模式研討會." from http://www.jkb.com.cn/localnews/beijing/2013/1015/298247.html.
國仁城鄉科技發展中心. "中國發展簡報NGO名錄:國仁城鄉科技發展中心." Retrieved 9/6, 2017, from http://www.chinadevelopmentbrief.org.cn/org591/.
康曉光、韓恒 (2010). 行政吸納社會:當前中國大陸國家與社會關係再研究, 八方文化創作室.
康曉光、韓恒、盧憲英 (2010). 行政吸納社會:當前中國大陸國家與社會關係研究, 八方文化創作室.
張苙雲 (1986). 組織社會學. 臺北, 三民.
張堅 (2016/06/03). "構建政府購買社會組織服務政策體系——北京市社會建設專項資金購買社會組織." from http://www.zgzcinfo.cn/sddc/39594.jhtml.
張曉紅、張海濤 (2009). "後奧運時期北京志願者組織發展研究." 中國農業大學學報(社會科學版) 26(3): 171-176.
曹逸韻 (2012/09/01). "知名天則所執照被吊銷?早已“名存實亡”." from http://e.chengdu.cn/html/2012-09/01/content_345753.htm.
梓鵬 (2016/03/08). 「女權五姐妹」之李婷婷:我現在很「溫和」. BBC中文網, BBC中文網.
陳佳俊、楊逢銀 (2014). "社會轉型背景下樞紐型社會組織功能定位研究——以上海市靜安區社會組織聯合會為例." 中共杭州市委黨校學報(1): 40-46.
陳鴻磊 (2016/8/25). "中國公益組織是另一場維權運動." from https://www.twreporter.org/a/china-ngo.
傑安迪、儲百亮 ( 2014/1/26). "新公民運動倡導者許志永獲刑4年." from https://cn.nytimes.com/china/20140126/c26xuzhiyong/zh-hant/?mcubz=3.
發展觀察(微信號:SocObs) (2016/09/26). "《前文回顧:反思“公益市場化”》專題." from https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/KaPUr620jqQoLVMdc-pZ_g.
黃安偉 (2015/01/07). 傳知行創辦人郭玉閃被正式逮捕. 紐約時報中文網, 紐約時報中文網.
黃應來、姚文軍 (2012/06/18). 貫徹落實廣東省第十一次黨代會精神:把工會打造成樞紐型社會組織. 南方日報, 南方日報: A04.
新浪公益 (2016/12/29). "阿拉善成首個“吃螃蟹”機構." from http://www.chinadevelopmentbrief.org.cn/news-19091.html.
新華社 (2013/11/15). "授權發布:中共中央關于全面深化改革若幹重大問題的決定." from http://news.xinhuanet.com/politics/2013-11/15/c_118164235.htm.
新華網 (2014/10/28). "習近平:關於《中共中央關於全面推進依法治國若干重大問題的決定》的說明." from http://news.xinhuanet.com/politics/2014-10/28/c_1113015372.htm.
楊斌 (2011/06/07). "當前美國急於輸出通貨膨脹和政治動盪." from http://theory.people.com.cn/GB/82288/143843/143844/14839850.html.
萬延海 (2014). "愛知行走過二十春秋." 台灣人權學刊 2(3): 117-130.
雷雨、卞德龍 (2012/02/28). 樞紐型組織建設倒逼群團組織轉型升級——“青年自組織能管理好自己”, 南方日報: A04版.
綠色創新發展中心. "綠色創新發展中心官網(關於我們)." Retrieved 08/30, 2017, from http://www.igdp.cn/our/index.
劉百穩 (2014/08/11). "解讀中國經濟新常態." from http://hsb.hsw.cn/2014-08/11/content_8546013.htm.
廣東省總工會 (2012/08/21). "廣東職工服務類社會組織聯合會." from http://www.gdftu.org.cn/gyys/links/cydwwz/201208/t20120821_310365.htm.
橫路 (2013/11/08). "背景資料:中共歷次重要三中全會." from http://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/trad/china/2013/11/131108_3rd_plenary_history.
聯合國婦女署微信 (2016/11/10). "“單親不孤單,賦權中國單親媽媽”活動圓滿舉辦." from http://www.onesheng.cn/mejs/shicifu/77819.html.
藍頂中介超市 (2016/08/27). "十八屆一中至七中全會主要成果." from https://read01.com/ajBN4M.html.