以馬約拉納零能模態為基礎的超導位元被視為實現量子運算的有力競
爭者。其原因為在此位元中，資訊基本上存儲於奈米線兩端的邊界態中，
此邊界態即為前述零能模態。由此二馬約拉納零能模態所組成的費米態具
有極強的非局部性，意味著要影響該位元，噪音的來源必須通時耦合兩個
空間上相隔甚遠的零能模態，因此該位元一般被認為在外界環境因子干
擾下，依然能保有良好的穩定性。本篇論文中，我們透過勃格留波夫變換
(Bogoliubov transformation) 模擬 T-junction 的 B12 順時針交換，並在無外界擾動情況下成功得到了理論上預期的結果，即兩個馬約拉納零能模態的混
成態分別得到 ±π/2 的幾何相位。然而，在透過荷斯坦模型 (Holstein model)
導入了聲子的擾動後，我們發現取決於施加擾動的位置，幾何相位有可能
因為該擾動而有向 0 靠近的趨勢。此結果顯示，馬約拉納零能模態為基礎
的超導位元並非完全不受環境擾動影響。

The Majorana-zero-mode based qubit is considered to be a potential candidate
for realizing full-scale quantum computation. In such a qubit, the information is
usually stored in well-separated edge modes of nanowires. These edge modes are
Majorana-zero-modes, which form highly non-local fermionic states. For an error
to occur, the source has to involve the coupling between both zero-modes, making
the qubit theoretically robust against almost any form of noise. In this thesis, we
numerically simulate the B12 braiding operation on a T-junction by utilising the
Bogoliubov-de Gennes formulation. Starting with the noise-free case, we success-
fully obtained the optimal ±π/2
Berry phase for the hybridised Majorana zero-mode
states, after a clockwise braiding; however, after introducing the phonon noise via
the Holstein model, we noticed that the Berry phase may start to degrade towards 0
depending on how the phonon noise couples to the zero-modes. Our results suggest
that the Majorana-based qubit is not entirely immune to noises.

[1] A. Y. Kitaev, “Unpaired majorana fermions in quantum wires,” Physics-Uspekhi, vol. 44,
pp. 131–136, oct 2001.
[2] R. M. Lutchyn, J. D. Sau, and S. Das Sarma, “Majorana fermions and a topological phase
transition in semiconductor-superconductor heterostructures,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 105,
p. 077001, Aug 2010.
[3] Y. Oreg, G. Refael, and F. von Oppen, “Helical liquids and majorana bound states in quan-
tum wires,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 105, p. 177002, Oct 2010.
[4] D. Aasen, M. Hell, R. V. Mishmash, A. Higginbotham, J. Danon, M. Leijnse, T. S.
Jespersen, J. A. Folk, C. M. Marcus, K. Flensberg, and J. Alicea, “Milestones toward
majorana-based quantum computing,” Phys. Rev. X, vol. 6, p. 031016, Aug 2016.
[5] J. Alicea, Y. Oreg, G. Refael, F. von Oppen, and M. P. A. Fisher, “Non-abelian statistics
and topological quantum information processing in 1d wire networks,” Nature Physics,
vol. 7, pp. 412–417, May 2011.
[6] J. Alicea, “New directions in the pursuit of majorana fermions in solid state systems,”
Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society (Great Britain), vol. 75, p. 076501, 07
2012.
[7] G. Goldstein and C. Chamon, “Decay rates for topological memories encoded with majo-
rana fermions,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 84, p. 205109, Nov 2011.
[8] J. C. Budich, S. Walter, and B. Trauzettel, “Failure of protection of majorana based qubits
against decoherence,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 85, p. 121405, Mar 2012.
[9] M. J. Schmidt, D. Rainis, and D. Loss, “Decoherence of majorana qubits by noisy gates,”
Phys. Rev. B, vol. 86, p. 085414, Aug 2012.
[10] B. A. BERNEVIG and T. L. Hughes, Topological Insulators and Topological Supercon-
ductors. Princeton University Press, stu - student edition ed., 2013.
[11] M. Leijnse and K. Flensberg, “Introduction to topological superconductivity and majorana
fermions,” Semiconductor Science and Technology, vol. 27, p. 124003, nov 2012.
[12] C.-K. Chiu, J. C. Y. Teo, A. P. Schnyder, and S. Ryu, “Classification of topological quan-
tum matter with symmetries,” Rev. Mod. Phys., vol. 88, p. 035005, Aug 2016.