研究生: |
陳雅伶 |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
上市策略對新產品績效之影響: 以產品創新性為干擾變數 The Impact of the Launch strategy on New Product Performance: the Moderating Effect of the Product Innovativeness |
指導教授: | 陳鴻基 |
口試委員: | |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
科技管理學院 - 科技管理研究所 Institute of Technology Management |
論文出版年: | 2004 |
畢業學年度: | 92 |
語文別: | 英文 |
論文頁數: | 44 |
中文關鍵詞: | 上市策略 、產品創新性 、新產品績效 |
外文關鍵詞: | Launch Strategy, Product Innovativeness, New Product Performance |
相關次數: | 點閱:2 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
現在的公司欲在競爭激烈的環境中生存,新產品開發扮演了舉足輕重的角色,然而,大部分的新產品都未達到公司設定的目標。因此許多研究致力於發現左右新產品績效的因素,其中,上市策略及產品創新性對新產品績效的影響被廣為討論。但是,將產品創新性視作直接影響新產品績效的因素時,過去的研究卻出現不同甚至矛盾的結果。因此,本研究在釐清上市策略對新產品績效影響之際,將產品創新性視為一干擾變數。
本研究將上市策略分為策略性上市決策及戰略性上市決策,而產品創新性則分成三個維度: 顧客面之產品優越性、顧客面之產品接納困難性及廠商面之市場新穎性。本研究結果顯示:(1)策略性上市決策對新產品績效有正面影響; (2)戰略上市決策對新產品績效的正面影響不顯著; (3)顧客面之產品優越性對(1)之關係有正面干擾效果; (4)市場新穎性對(1)之關係有負面干擾效果; (5)顧客面之產品接納困難性對(1)之關係之干擾效果不顯著。
New product development plays an important role in the contemporary competitive circumstance. However, most of new product introduced to the market did not reach their business objectives. The phenomenon has led to a lot of studies trying to identify determinants of the success and failure of new products. Among those determinants, the launch strategy and the product innovativeness are discussed frequently in past researches. As for product innovativeness, there exist three contradictive results when treating it as a dependent variable which directly effects on new product performance. Thus, this study examined the impact of launch strategy on new product performance and treated product innovativeness as a moderate variable.
There are two dimensions of launch strategy: strategic launch decisions and tactical launch decisions. Product innovativeness included product superiority to the customer, market newness to the firm, and adoption difficulty to the customer. This study indicates that strategic launch decisions have a positive effect on new product performance. However, the analyses also show that there are no enough evidence to link the tactical launch decisions and new product performance. The moderating effects of product innovativeness are examined. First, “product superiority to the customer” had a positive moderating effect on new product performance. Second, “market newness to the firm” had a negative moderating effect on new product performance. Surprisingly, adoption difficulty to the customer did not have a significant moderating effect on new product performance.
Ali, A., R. Jr. Krapfel, and D. LaBahn “Product innovativeness and entry strategy: impact on cycle time and break-even time,” Journal of Product Innovation Management 12:54-69 (1995)
Atuahene-Gima, K. “Differential potency of factors affecting innovation performance in manufacturing and services firms in Australia,” Journal of Product Innovation Management 13:35-52 (1996)
Beard, C. and C. Easingwood “New product launch: marketing action and launch tactics for high-technology products,” Journal of Marketing Management 25(2):87-103 (1996)
Balachandra, R. and J. H. Friar “Factors for success in R&D projects and new product innovation: a contextual framework,” IEEE Transaction on Engineering Management 44(3):276-287 (1997)
Biggadike, E. R. Corporate diversification: entry, strategy and performance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (1979)
Calantone, R. G. and M. M. Montoya-Weiss Product launch and follow on. In: Managing New Technology Development WmE Souder and JD Sherman (eds.) 217-248 (1993)
Choffray, J. M. and G. L. Lilien “Strategies behind the successful industrial product launch,” Business Marketing November: 82-95 (1984)
Choffray, J. M. and G. L. Lilien “A decision-support system for evaluating sales prospects and launch strategies for new products,” Industrial Marketing Management 15:75-85 (1986)
Clark, K. and T. Fujimoto Product development performance: strategy, organization and management in the world auto industry. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press (1991)
Cooper, R. G. “The dimensions of industrial new product success and failure,” Journal of Marketing 43:93-103 (1979)
Cooper, R. G. and E. J. Kleinschmidt “New products: what separates the winners from the losers?” Journal of Product Innovation Management 4:169-184 (1987)
Cooper, R. G. and E. J. Kleinschmidt “Resource allocation in the new product process,” Industrial Marketing Management 17:249-262 (1988)
Cooper, R.G. and U. D. Brentani “New industrial financial services: what distinguishes the winners,” Journal of Product Innovation Management 8:75-90 (1991)
Crawford, C. M. “New product failure rates: a reprise,” Research Management July-August:10-24 (1987)
de Brentani, U. “Success and failure in new industrial services,” Journal of Product Innovation Management 6:239-258 (1989)
Garcia, Rosanna and R. Calantone “A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review,” Journal of Product Innovation Management 19:110-132 (2002)
Green, D. H. and A. B. Ryans “Entry strategies and market performance: causal modeling of a business simulation,” Journal of Product Innovation Management 7:45-58 (1990)
Griffin, A. “Modeling and measuring product development cycle time across industries,” Marketing Science Institute Working Paper Boston: MA 95-117 (1995)
Griffin, A. “PDMA research on new product development practices: updating trends, and benchmarking best practices,” Journal of Product Innovation Management 14:429-458 (1997)
Hultink, E. J., A. Griffin, H. S. J. Robben and S. Hart, “In search of generic launch strategies for new product,” International Journal of Research in Marketing 15:269-285 (1998)
Hultink, E. J., A. Griffin, S. Hart, and H. S. J. Robben “Industrial new product launch strategies and product development performance,” Journal of Product Innovation Management 14(4):243-257 (1997)
Hultink, E. J. and H. S. J. Robben “Launch strategy and new product performance: an empirical examination in the Netherlands,” Journal of Product Innovation Management 16:545-556 (1999)
Hultink, E. J., S. Hart, H. S. J. Robben, and A. Griffin “Launch decisions and new product success: an empirical comparison of consumer and industrial products,” Journal of Product Innovation Management 17(1):5-23 (2000)
Koberg, C. S., D. R. Detienne, and K.A. Heppard “An empirical test of environmental, organizational, and process factors affecting incremental and radical innovation,” Journal of High Technology Management Research 14:21-45 (2003)
Lambkin, M. “Order of entry and performance in new markets,” Strategic Management Journal 9:127-140 (1988)
Lee, Y. and G. C. O’Connor “The impact of communication strategy on launching new products: the moderating role of product innovativeness,” Journal of Product Innovation Management 20:4-21 (2003)
Maidique, M. A. and B. J. Zirger “A study of success and failure in product innovation: the case of the U.S. electronics industry,” IEEE Transaction on Engineering Management 31:192-203 (1984)
McDermott C. M. and G. C. O’Connor “Managing radical innovation: an overview of emergent strategy issues,” Journal of Product Innovation Management 19:424-438 (2002)
Ryder, I. K. “Is branding important in business-to-business? An IT industry view,” Journal of Brand Management 9:357-369 (1994)
Sethi, R. and Smith, D.C., et al. “Cross-functional product development teams, creativity, and the innovativeness of new consumer products,” Journal of Marketing Research 38(February):73-85 (2001)
Urban, G. L. and J. R. Hauser Design and marketing of new products. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. (1993)
Yoon, E. and G. L. Lilien “New industrial product performance: the effect of market characteristics and strategy,” Journal of Product Innovation Management 3:134-144 (1985)
New-product troubles have firms cutting back. The Wall Street Journal Jan. 13, B1 (1992)