簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 吳秉純
Wu, Ping-chun
論文名稱: 高中生雙元學習信念之量表發展與模式檢驗
High school students’ dual learning beliefs: Scales development and model testing
指導教授: 陳舜文
Chen, Shun-Wen
口試委員: 陳素燕
Chen, Su-Yen
陳思光
Chen, Ssu-Kuang
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 清華學院 - 學習科學研究所
Institute of Learning Sciences
論文出版年: 2019
畢業學年度: 107
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 130
中文關鍵詞: 雙元學習信念學習美德觀學習心智觀學習滿意度學習投入學業表現
外文關鍵詞: Dual learning beliefs, Virtue-oriented belief, Mind-oriented belief, Learning satisfaction, Learning engagement, Learning performance
相關次數: 點閱:3下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 在臺灣的教育改革歷程中,如何賦予學生學習自主性,並保留傳統所推崇的勤
    學美德,向來是核心爭點。然而,過去少有針對臺灣學生學習信念之研究,亦無對
    應的測量工具可供探討中西文化學習信念與學業表現之關聯。因此,本研究進行兩
    項子研究:研究一目的為建構華人「學習美德觀」與西方「學習心智觀」兩種學習
    信念,並發展具信效度之「雙元學習信念」量表。參與者為104 名高中學生(男生
    53 名,女生54 名)。驗證性因素分析結果顯示:「學習美德觀」與「學習心智觀」各含三個因素,美德觀為「自我完善」、「角色義務」與「美德修練」;心智觀為「自我實現」、「興趣探索」與「心智精進」。兩信念中的三項因素皆對應「自我目標」、「學習動機」與「學習歷程」三個層面。研究二運用此量表,探討高中學生「雙元學習信念」與「學習滿意度」、「學習投入」、「學業表現」之間的關聯。研究二採問卷法,參與者為206 名高中學生(男生101 名,女生105 名)。結構方程模式徑路分析結果符合假設:(1)「學習美德觀」信念可預測「學習投入」程度;(2)「學習心智觀」信念可預測「學習滿意度」;(3)「學習滿意度」可預測「學習投入」程度,並且「學習投入」可預測「學業表現」。本研究之結果指出台灣高中學生的中、西文化學習信念對學習具有兩種不同功能,此研究對教育實務界瞭解當代臺灣學生所握持之學習信念,具有理論與實務上之參考價值。


    The purposes of the research are to develop and examine a culture-sensitive scale reflecting high school students’ Chinese and western learning beliefs. Two studies were conducted for present purposes. Study one focuses on the development of the Dual Learning Beliefs Scale that includes two subscales: Virtue-oriented Belief Scale (VBS) and Mind-oriented Belief Scale (MBS). In this study, 104 high school students (53 males and 51 females) were recruited. The results of confirmatory factor analysis show that both subscales consisting of 3 factors related to self-goals, learning motivations, and learning processes. The VBS is made up by “Self-perfection”, “Role obligation” and “Virtue enhancement” while the MBS has factors ranging from “Self-actualization,” “Interest exploration,” to “Mind mastery.” Study two applies the scale in a dual learning model to test the effects of virtue- and mind-oriented beliefs on learning satisfaction, learning engagement and learning performance. A total of 206 high school students (101 males and 105 females) completed the Dual Learning Beliefs Scale and scales regarding other main variables. The path analysis of structural equation modeling reveals that (1) participants’ virtue-oriented belief directly predicts learning engagement, (2) their mind-oriented belief solely predicts learning satisfaction, and (3) learning satisfaction positively predicts learning engagement which could predict learning performance. In summary, the results indicate that among Taiwanese high school students, learning thrives through two sets of beliefs rooted in Chinese culture and western philosophy respectively. Both beliefs have their unique ways in engaging learning and boost positive outcomes. The finding is essential for academia and field practitioners to understand current Taiwanese teenage learners.

    中文摘要..................................... i 英文摘要..................................... ii 誌謝辭....................................... iii 目次......................................... iv 表目次....................................... v 圖目次....................................... vii 第一章 緒論................................. 1 第一節 研究動機............................. 1 第二節 東西文化的學習觀..................... 4 第二章 文獻探討............................. 9 第一節 學習的文化意義:心智取向或美德取向... 12 第二節 學習信念在自我目標上的文化差異....... 19 第三節 學習信念在學習動機上的文化差異....... 24 第四節 學習信念在學習歷程上的文化差異....... 29 第五節 「雙元學習信念」之概念內涵........... 33 第三章 研究一:雙元學習信念量表之發展....... 36 第一節 研究目的............................. 36 第二節 研究方法............................. 38 第三節 研究結果............................. 49 第四章 研究二:學習信念與學習成效........... 71 第一節 研究目的............................. 71 第二節 研究方法............................. 75 第三節 研究結果............................. 82 第五章 結論……….............................. 100 第一節 結果摘述............................. 100 第二節 研究結果討論......................... 101 第三節 研究限制與建議....................... 111 參考文獻..................................... 113 附件一....................................... 125 附件二....................................... 126

    毛瑜(1995年7月17日)。中市推動現代教育實驗班 下學期將有中小學生一百八十人參加,中國時報,14版。
    王欣怡(1995年8月31日)。國小試辦開放教育使學童在人性化教學中自主學習 實施效果良好,今年決再增64校。中央日報。
    卡爾・羅傑斯(1990)。成為一個人(宋文里譯)。臺北市:桂冠。(原著出版於1970年)
    行政院中部聯合服務中心(2012年1月3日)。「教育部會逐年提高國民小學教師員額編製,達成國小精緻國教目標」。行政院中部聯合服務中心最新消息【新聞群組】。取自:https://www.eycc.ey.gov.tw/
    余安邦(1996)。文化心理學的歷史發展與研究進路:兼論其與心態史學的關係。本土心理學研究,6,2-60。
    余安邦(2005)。成就動機與成就觀念:華人文化心理的探索。載於楊國樞、黃光國、楊中芳(主編),華人本土心理學(下)(665-711)。臺北:遠流。
    余英時(2007)。知識人與中國文化的價值。臺北市:時報文化。
    吳明隆(2009)。結構方程模式—AMOS的操作與應用。臺北市:五南。
    李家同(2015年3月30日)。不要再折磨年輕人,改回聯招吧。大紀元臺灣【新聞群組】。取自:http://www.epochtimes.com/b5/15/3/29/n4399511.htm
    李家同(2018年3月29日)。學測5萬人不到40級分,補救教學喊假的。聯合新聞網【新聞群組】。取自https://udn.com/news/story/7266/3059531
    李逢堅、濮世緯(2014)。國中生學習者角色認同之研究:以臺北市昇學國中為例。教育科學期刊,13(1),1-24。
    杜維明(2003)。儒教(陳靜譯)。臺北市:麥田。
    邢麗菊、盧風(2016)。「天人合一」與「內向超越」。哲學與文化,43(11),121-135。
    尚會鵬、游國龍(2010)。心理文化學:許烺光學說的研究與應用。臺北市:南天。
    林志成(2018年9月24日)。升學改門檻 繁星推薦搞矛盾。中時電子報【新聞群組】。取自https://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20180924000362-260114?chdtv
    林曉雲、洪定宏、蔡淑媛、梁珮綺(2016年5月22日)。國二生升學管道更多元 家長憂更亂。自由時報電子報,取自https://news.ltn.com.tw/news
    /focus/paper/992467
    邱皓政(2010)。量化研究與統計分析:SPSS資料分析範例。臺北市:五南。
    邱皓政(2011)。結構方程模式:Lisrel / Simplis原理與應用(二版)。臺北市:雙葉。
    洪瑞斌(2017)。「個我」與「大我」以雙文化自我觀點建構臺灣大學生生涯敘說。本土心理學研究,47,161-231。
    徐復觀(1988)。中國人性論史:先秦篇。臺北市:臺灣商務。
    秦生(2016年3月18日)。升學軍備競賽方興未艾。東網【新聞群組】。取自https://hk.on.cc/tw/bkn/cnt/commentary/20160318/bkntw-201603180004
    28025-0318_04411_001.html
    馬克思・韋伯(1989)。中國的宗教:儒教與道教(簡惠美譯)。臺北市:遠流。(原著出版於1915年)
    國教署(2015年1月29日)。教育發展新契機-實驗教育三法。教育部即時新聞【新聞群組】。取自:https://www.edu.tw/news_Content.aspx?n=9E7A
    C85F1954DDA8&s=C5AC6858C0DC65F3
    教育部(2014年11月)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。新北市:國家教育研究院。取自:https://www.naer.edu.tw/files/15-1000-14113,c639-1.php?Lang=zh-tw
    張芃婕、鄭宇庭(2017)。影響高中學生學習表現之研究 。數據分析,12(6),47-60。
    張春興(1996)。教育心理學:三化取向的理論與實踐。臺北市:東華。
    張春興(2006)。張氏心理學辭典(重訂版)。臺北市:東華。
    梁漱溟(2013)。中國文化要義。臺北市:臺灣商務印書館。
    許烺光(2002)。宗族,種姓與社團。臺北市:南天。
    陳舜文、魏嘉瑩(2013)。大學生學習動機之「雙因素模式」:學業認同與角色認同之功能。中華心理學刊,55(1),41-55。
    陳順宇(2005)。多變量分析第四版。臺北市:華泰。
    陳榮裕;蔡慧貞(1998年7月2日)。北政自主學習實驗學校開創教育新模式: 以學程為學習單位 可隨意選修 三年後師生共同治校,中國時報,19版。
    陳慧蓉,張郁雯、薛承泰(2018)。脈絡因素、學業自我概念、與學習投入對學業表現的影響:臺灣國小三年級經濟弱勢與一般學生之比較。當代教育研究季刊,26(2),73-107。
    陶以哲(2013年10月12日)。不考的不重要,要考的將來用得到?──一名高中體育老師的反省。獨立評論【新聞群組】。取自https://opinion.cw.com.tw/blog/profile/52/article/669
    陸洛(2003)。人我關係之界定--「折衷自我」的現身。本土心理學研究,20,139-207。
    陸洛、楊國樞(2005)。社會取向與個人取向的自我實現觀:概念分析與實徵初探。本土心理學研究,23,3-69。
    曾兆興(2010)。國民中小學學生思考風格對學習滿意度之影響。學校行政,70,69-92。
    馮朝霖(主編)(2018 )。喚醒夢想‧釋放天賦 臺灣實驗教育的另類課程實踐。新北市:國家教育研究院。
    黃光國(2004)。儒家社會中的生活目標與角色義務。本土心理學研究,22,121-193。
    黃光國(2005)。華人的道德觀與正義觀。載於楊國樞、黃光國、楊中芳(主編),華人本土心理學(上)(407-446頁)。臺北市:遠流。
    黃光國(2005)。華人社會中的臉面觀。載於楊國樞、黃光國、楊中芳(主編),華人本土心理學(上)(365-405頁)。臺北市:遠流。
    黃武雄(1995)臺灣教育的重建。臺北市:遠流。
    黃彥超(2016)。實驗教育三法分析與影響之探究。臺灣教育評論月刊,5(4),44-49。
    黃瀚嶠(2018年6月19日)。「我不是完美學生」:破解實驗教育神話。倡議家【新聞群組】。取自:https://ubrand.udn.com/ubrand/story/11815/
    3206773
    黃囇莉、朱瑞玲(2007)。是亂流?還是潮起、潮落?--尋找臺灣的「核心價值」及其變遷與方向。陳東升(主持人)心理價值與人際關係(三)。臺灣的社會變遷1985-2005:臺灣社會變遷調查計畫第十一次研討會,台北市:中央研究院社會學研究所。
    葛樹人(1996)。心理測驗學。台北市:桂冠。
    楊中芳(1993)。試論如何深化本土心理學研究:兼評現階段之研究成果。本土心理學研究,1,122-183。
    楊俊傑(2017)。Philosophos探源 。哲學與文化,44(8),135-150。
    楊國樞、葉明華(2005)。家族主義與泛家族主義。載於楊國樞、黃光國、楊中芳(主編),華人本土心理學(上)(249-292頁)。臺北市:遠流。
    溫帶維(2002)。李澤厚的「西體中用說」:一個唯物主義者對中國文化的評價。哲學與文化,29(3),218-231。
    葉光輝(2005)。孝道的心理與行為。載於楊國樞、黃光國、楊中芳(主編),華人本土心理學(上)(293-329頁)。臺北市:遠流。
    葉光輝、章英華、曹惟純(2007)。臺灣地區民眾家庭價值觀之變遷與可能心理機制。傅抑止(主持人)家庭。臺灣的社會變遷1985-2005:臺灣社會變遷調查計畫第十一次研討會,台北市:中央研究院社會學研究所。
    葉坤靈(1998)。四位西洋思想家的教育改革論點-教育視野之擴展。師大學報,43(2),1-20。
    劉韶軍(2001)。儒家學習思想研究。武昌市,華中師範大學出版社。
    鄭昭明(2006)。認知心理學:理論與實踐。臺北市:桂冠。
    盧梭(1997)。愛彌兒(魏肇基譯)。臺北市:商務。(原著出版於1762年)
    親子天下編輯群(2017)。實驗教育,招生中。親子天下專特刊,29,1-20。
    親子天下編輯群(2018)。實驗教育選校指南。臺北市:親子天下。
    錢永祥(2008)。如何理解儒家的「道德內在說」:以泰勒為對比。政治大學哲學學報,19,1-32。
    錢穆(1968)。中華文化十二講。臺北市:東大圖書公司。
    霍華德・嘉納(2000)。學習的紀律(魯燕萍 譯)。臺北市:臺灣商務印書館。(原著出版於2000年)
    霍華德・嘉納(2007)。心智解構:發現你的天才(莊安祺譯)。臺北市:時報。(原著出版於1994年)
    羅梅英(2018年9月1日)。國中教育怎麼改。未來Family【新聞群組】取自https://gfamily.cwgv.com.tw/content/index/12619
    關永中(2002)。認知結構與運作—知識論的法則。載於沈清松(主編),哲學概論(67-142頁)。臺北市:五南。
    騰邑文化編輯部,(2013),臺灣教育的世紀回顧:民國時期。新北市:零極限文化出版社。
    Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261-271.
    Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117-148.
    Black, A. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000). The effects of instructors' autonomy support and students' autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self‐determination theory perspective. Science Education, 84(6), 740-756.
    Bond, M. H., & Hwang, K. K. (1986). The social psychology of Chinese people. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), The psychology of the Chinese people (pp. 213-264). Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
    Buckner, J. C., Mezzacappa, E., & Beardslee, W. R. (2003). Characteristics of resilient youths living in poverty: The role of self-regulatory processes. Development and Psychopathology, 15(01), 139-162.
    Chao, R. K. (1994). Classic definitions and new directions: Understanding Chinese parenting through the cultural notion of training. Child Development, 65(4), 1111-1119. doi:10.2307/1131308
    Chao, R. K. (2001), Extending research on the consequences of parenting style for Chinese Americans and European Americans. Child Development, 72: 1832–1843. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00381
    Chen, S. W., Wang, H. H., Wei, C. F., Fwu, B. J., & Hwang, K. K. (2009). Taiwanese students' self-attributions for two types of achievement goals. The Journal of Social Psychology, 149(2), 179-194.
    Chen, W. W., & Wong, Y. L. (2014). What my parents make me believe in learning: The role of filial piety in Hong Kong students' motivation and academic achievement. International Journal of Psychology, 49(4), 249-256.
    Chen, X. (2010). Socioemotional development in Chinese children. In M. H. Bond (Ed.) The Oxford handbook of Chinese psychology (pp. 37-52). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Cheng, R. W. Y., & Lam, S. F. (2013). The interaction between social goals and self-construal on achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(2), 136-148.
    Cheung, C. S., & McBride-Chang, C. (2008). Relations of perceived maternal parenting style, practices, and learning motivation to academic competence in Chinese children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 54(1), 1-22.
    Church, A., Katigbak, M. S., Locke, K. D., Zhang, H., Shen, J., de Jesús Vargas-Flores, J., & Ching, C. M. (2013). Need satisfaction and well-being: Testing self-determination theory in eight cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44(4), 507-534.
    Connell, J. P., Halpem-Felsher, B. L., Clifford, E., Crichlow, W., & Usinger, P. (1995). Hanging in there: Behavioral, psychological, and contextual factors affecting whether African American adolescents stay in high school. Journal of adolescent research, 10(1), 41-63.
    Connell, J. P., Spencer, M. B., & Aber, J. L. (1994). Educational risk and resilience in African‐American youth: Context, self, action, and outcomes in school. Child Development, 65(2), 493-506.
    d’Ailly, H. (2003). Children’s autonomy and perceived control in learning: A model of motivation and achievement in Taiwan. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 84-96.
    d'Ailly, H. (2004). The Role of choice in children's learning: A distinctive cultural and gender difference in efficacy, interest, and effort. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 36(1), 17-29.
    Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media.
    Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M (2018). Theory, self-determination theory. Retrieved from http://selfdeterminationtheory.org
    Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The" what" and" why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
    DeWitz, S. J., & Walsh, W. B. (2002). Self-efficacy and college student satisfaction. Journal of Career Assessment, 10(3), 315-326
    Duckworth, A. L., & Seligman, M. E. (2005). Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents. Psychological Science, 16(12), 939-944.
    Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256-273.
    Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2× 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 501-519
    Elliot, A. J., Chirkov, V. I., Kim, Y., & Sheldon, K. M. (2001). A cross-cultural analysis of avoidance (relative to approach) personal goals. Psychological Science, 12(6), 505-510.
    Fiske, A. P. (2002). Using individualism and collectivism to compare cultures – A critique of the validity and measurement of the constructs: Comment on Oyserman et al. (2002). Psychological Bulletin, 128, 78-88.
    Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382-388.
    Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.
    Funder, D. C., Block, J. H., & Block, J. (1983). Delay of gratification: Some longitudinal personality correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(6), 1198-1213.
    Fwu B-J, Chen S-W, Wei C-F and Wang H-H (2017) The mediating role of self-exertion on the effects of effort on learning virtues and emotional distress in academic failure in a Confucian context. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 2047. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02047
    Fwu, B. J., Wang, H. H., Chen, S. W., & Wei, C. F. (2016 ). ‘Feeling bad’ or ‘being bad?’ The trapping effect of effort in academic failure in a Confucian cultural context. Educational Psychology, 37(4), 506-519.
    Gardner, W. L., Gabriel, S., & Lee, A. Y. (1999). “I” value freedom, but “we” value relationships: Self-construal priming mirrors cultural differences in judgment. Psychological Science, 10(4), 321-326.
    Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data     analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
    Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond culture. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books
    Heine, S. J. (2001). Self as cultural product: An examination of East Asian and North American selves. Journal of Personality, 69(6), 881-905.
    Heine, S. J., Lehman, D. R., Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1999). Is there a universal need for positive self-regard?. Psychological Review, 106(4), 766-794.
    Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 88-140.
    Hong Y. Y., Morris M. W., Chiu C. Y., & Benet-Martínez, V. (2000). Multicultural minds: A dynamic constructivist approach to culture and cognition. American Psychologist, 55, 709–720.
    Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.
    Hui, E. K. P., Sun, R. C. F., Chow, S. S., & Chu, M. H. (2011). Explaining Chinese students' academic motivation: Filial piety and self-determination. Educational Psychology, 31(3), 377-392. doi: 10.1080/01443410.2011.559309
    Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (1999). Rethinking the value of choice: a cultural perspective on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(3), 349-366.
    Jerrim, J. (2015). Why do East Asian children perform so well in PISA? An investigation of Western-born children of East Asian descent. Oxford Review of Education, 41(3), 310-333.
    Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (1996). Further examining the American dream: Differential correlates of intrinsic and extrinsic goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(3), 280-287.
    Kim, S., Wang, Y., Orozco-Lapray, D., Shen, Y., & Murtuza, M. (2013). Does “tiger parenting” exist? Parenting profiles of Chinese Americans and adolescent developmental outcomes. Asian American Journal of Psychology, 4(1), 7-18. doi:10.1037/a0030612
    Kim, Y., Kasser, T., & Lee, H. (2003). Self-concept, aspirations, and well-being in South Korea and the United States. The Journal of Social Psychology, 143(3), 277-290.
    King, R. B., & McInerney, D. M. (2014). Culture's consequences on student motivation: Capturing cross-cultural universality and variability through personal investment theory. Educational Psychologist, 49(3), 175-198.
    King, R. B., McInerney, D. M., & Watkins, D. A. (2013). Examining the role of social goals in school: A study in two collectivist cultures. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28, 1505-1523.
    Lam, S. F., Cheng, R. W. (2013). The interaction between social goals and self-construal on achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38, 136-148.
    Lau, S., & Yeung, P. P. (1996). Understanding Chinese child development: The role of culture in socialization. In Lau, S (Ed.) Growing up the Chinese way: Chinese child and adolescent development (pp. 29-44). Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.
    Li, J. (2003). US and Chinese cultural beliefs about learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 258-267. dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.258
    Li, J. (2004). Learning as a task or a virtue: US and Chinese preschoolers explain learning. Developmental Psychology, 40(4), 595-605. dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.40.4.595
    Li, J. (2005). Mind or virtue: Western and Chinese beliefs about learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(4), 190-194. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00362.x
    Li, J. (2012). Cultural foundations of learning: East and West. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
    Li, J. (2016). Humility in learning: A Confucian perspective. Journal of Moral Education, 45(2), 147-165.
    Li, J. , Yamamoto, Y. , Kinnane, J. M., Shugarts, B. C. and Ho, C. K. (2019). From learning beliefs to achievement among Chinese immigrant and European American preschool children. Child Development, 90: e230-e245. doi:10.1111/cdev.13055
    Luthar, S. S., Cicchetti, D., & Becker, B. (2000). The construct of resilience: A critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Development, 71(3), 543-562.
    Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224-253. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224
    McInerney, D. M. (2008). Personal investment, culture and learning: Insights into school achievement across Anglo, Aboriginal, Asian and Lebanese students in Australia. International Journal of Psychology, 43(5), 870-879. doi: 10.1080/00207590701836364
    Mega, C., Ronconi, L., & De Beni, R. (2014). What makes a good student? How emotions, self-regulated learning, and motivation contribute to academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 121-131.
    Menon, T., Morris, M. W., Chiu, C. Y., & Hong, Y. Y. (1999). Culture and the construal of agency: Attribution to individual versus group dispositions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(5), 701-717.
    Nisbett, R. (2004). The geography of thought: How Asians and Westerners think differently… and why. New York, NY: Free Press.
    Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128(1), 3-72.
    Pan, Y., Gauvain, M., & Schwartz, S. J. (2013). Do parents’ collectivistic tendency and attitudes toward filial piety facilitate autonomous motivation among young Chinese adolescents?. Motivation and Emotion, 37(4), 701-711.
    Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 315-341.
    Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students' self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 91-105.
    Putwain, D., Sander, P., & Larkin, D. (2013). Academic self-efficacy in study-related skills and behaviours: Relations with learning-related emotions and academic success. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(4), 633-650. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.2012.02084.x
    Reyes, J. A., & Elias, M. J. (2011). Fostering social–emotional resilience among Latino youth. Psychology in the Schools, 48(7), 723-737.
    Rutter, M. (1987). Psychosocial resilience and protective mechanisms. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 57(3), 316-331. doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-0025.1987.tb03541.
    Ryan, J., & Louie, K. (2007). False dichotomy? ‘Western’ and ‘Confucian’ concepts of scholarship and learning. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 39(4), 404-417.
    Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
    Ryan, R.M., & Connell, J.P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 749-761.
    Sheldon, K. M., Elliot, A. J., Kim, Y., & Kasser, T. (2001). What is satisfying about satisfying events? Testing 10 candidate psychological needs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(2), 325-339.
    Shweder, R. A. (1991). Thinking through cultures: Expeditions in cultural psychology. Harvard University Press.
    Shweder, R. A., & Sullivan, M. A. (1993). Cultural psychology: Who needs it?. Annual Review of Psychology, 44(1), 497-523.
    Shweder, R. A., Goodnow, J. J., Hatano, G., LeVine, R. A., Markus, H. R., & Miller, P. J. (2006). The cultural psychology of development: One mind, many mentalities. In R. M. Lerner & W. Damon (Eds.) Handbook of child psychology (pp. 716-792). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
    Steiger, J. H. (1980). Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 87(2), 245.
    Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., Way, N., Hughes, D., Yoshikawa, H., Kalman, R. K. and Niwa, E. Y. (2008). Parents’ goals for children: The dynamic coexistence of individualism and collectivism in cultures and individuals. Social Development, 17: 183–209. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9507.2007.00419.x
    Tao, V. Y., & Hong, Y. Y. (2013). When academic achievement is an obligation: Perspectives from social-oriented achievement motivation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45(1), 110-136. doi: 10.1177/0022022113490072
    Tesar, M., & Locke, K. (1973). The philosophy of education. In R. S. Peters (Ed.) Philosophy (pp. 238-256). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., & Waterhouse, F. (1999). Relations between teachers' approaches to teaching and students' approaches to learning. Higher Education, 37(1), 57-70.
    Vansteenkiste, M., Zhou, M., Lens, W., & Soenens, B. (2005). Experiences of autonomy and control among Chinese learners: Vitalizing or immobilizing?. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(3), 468-483
    Weale, S. (2014, Oct. 9). ‘Culture, not just curriculum’, determines east Asian school success. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com
    Zusho, A., Pintrich, P. R., & Cortina, K. S. (2005). Motives, goals, and adaptive patterns of performance in Asian American and Anglo American students. Learning and Individual Differences, 15(2), 141-158.

    QR CODE