研究生: |
吳麗蘋 |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
TFT-LCD新產品設計驗證測試流程改善與評估 Reengineering and Evaluation of TFT-LCD Product Design Verification Process: The Overlapping Approach |
指導教授: | 蘇哲平 |
口試委員: |
張國浩
陳文智 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
工學院 - 工業工程與工程管理學系 Department of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management |
論文出版年: | 2011 |
畢業學年度: | 99 |
語文別: | 英文 |
論文頁數: | 72 |
中文關鍵詞: | 設計驗證測試階段 、同步流程 、薪產品開發 、薄膜電晶體液晶顯示器 、存貨風險 |
相關次數: | 點閱:2 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
近年來液晶顯示器(Liquid Crystal Display)蓬勃發展,而在薄膜電晶體液晶顯示器(Thin Film Transistor-Liquid Crystal Display, TFT-LCD)產業中縮短產品設計開發時間是最重要的競爭優勢之一。其中產品設計驗證測試階段(Design Verification Testing, DVT) 是產品設計開發中費時最久的部分,對於公司決定可大量生產的時間以及給予客戶的交期有相當大的影響。為了縮短產品設計開發時間,在符合高標準的品質控管條件下快速滿足客戶端的出貨要求,本研究針對TFT-LCD新產品設計驗證測試流程之特性進行流程改善變更,使部分活動同步進行,加速新產品設計驗證測試流程進入放量生產階段,並有效縮短客戶交期,增加市場競爭力。本研究利用數學模型推導,計算使用傳統流程與同步流程時完成產品設計驗證測試階段所需的平均時間,並繪製其分配,計算存貨損失風險機率,以便公司評估使用同步流程所獲得的利益並與其所產生的風險相比較以決定是否使用同步流程。最後,本研究透過研究三種不同生產情境以推論在什麼情形下應該使用同步流程,及其前端製程最適放量決策點,做為公司決策放量之參考。
Short product development lead time is one of the most important competitive advantages in TFT-LCD industry. Design Verification Testing (DVT) process accounts for much of this lead time. In this research, we propose a new DVT process by overlapping some of the activities to shorten the product development lead time. In addition, we develop mathematical models to evaluate the expected DVT times of both original and overlapped DVT processes as well as the probability of inventory lost for the overlapped process. By comparing the expected product development lead times of these two processes against the risk of inventory loss of the overlapped process, the company can evaluate the benefit of adopting the overlapped process against its potential risks. Three product types are studied to determine the conditions under which the overlapped process is preferred. Once the overlapped process is adopted, the optimal date to release production order for front-end process is also studied.
[1] Albert Y. Ha and Evan L. Porteus. “Optimal Timing of Reviews in Concurrent Design for Manufacturability.” (1995), Management Science, Vol. 41, No. 9, pp. 1431-1447
[2] Amiya K. Chakravarty. “Overlapping design and build cycles in product development.” (2001), European Journal of Operational Research , Vol. 134, pp.392-424
[3] AUO. “ TFT-LCD process ” (2007), Retrieved January 17, 2011, from http://www.auo.com
[4] Billie Jo Zirger, Modesto A. Maidique. “A model of new product development: An empirical test” (1990),Management Science,Vol.36, No.7, pp.867-883
[5] Biskup, D. “Single-machine scheduling with learning considerations.” (1999). European Journal of Operational Research, 115:173-178.
[6] Blackburn, J. D., Ed. “Time Based Competition: The Next Battleground in American Manufacturing.” (1991),Business One Irwin, Homewood, IL.
[7] Christian Terwiesch and Christoph H. Loch. “Measuring the Effectiveness of Overlapping Development Activities.” (1999) , Management Science, Vol. 45, No. 4, pp. 455-465
[8] Christian Terwiesch, Christoph H. Loch. “ Measuring the effectiveness of overlapping development activities.” (1999), Management Science, Vol.45, NO.(4), pp.455-465
[9]
Christoph H. Loch, Christian Terwiesch. “Communication and Uncertainty in Concurrent Engineering.” (1998) .Management Science, Vol. 44, No. 8 , pp. 1032-1048
[10] Clark, K.B.,T. Fujimoto, “Product Development Performance: Strategy, Organization and Management in the World Auto Industry.” (1991). Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA.
[11] Cohen, Wesley M. and S. Klepper, “Firm Size and the Nature of Innovation within Industries: The Case of Process and Product R&D, (1996)” Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 78, pp. 232-243.
[12] Cusumano, M. A., R. W.Selby. “ Microsoft Secrets: How the World's Most Powerful Software Company Creates Technology, Shapes Markets, and Manages People. ” (1995).The Free Press, New York.
[13] DisplaySearch “ Panel Track Results ”, (2010).Retrieved November 13, 2010, from http:// www.displaysearch.com
[14] Hauck, W. C., Bansal, A., Allan, P. E., & Hauck, A. J. “Simultaneous engineering - correlates of success”. (1997). International Journal of Production Economics, 52(1-2), 83-90.
[15] Imai, K., I. Nonaka, H. Takeuchi. “ Managing the new product development process: how the Japanese companies learn and unlearn.” K.B. Clark, R.H. Hayes, C. Lorenz, eds. The Uneasy Alliance. (1985). Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
[16] Ji HongYan, Cheng Wu. “A Scheduling Approach for Design Activities in Concurrent Engineering”,(2001).IEEE Transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics—Part c: applications and reviews,Vol.31,NO.3,pp.361-365
[17]
Jo, H. H., Parsaei, H. R. and Sullivan, W. R., ‘Principles of concurrent engineering’, in Parsaei, H. R. and Sullivan, W. G. (eds), (1993) Concurrent Engineering,Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 3–23.
[18] Jun Lin, Kah Hin Chai, Aarnout C. Brombacher, Yoke San Wong, “Optimal overlapping and functional interaction in product development.” (2009). European Journal of Operational Research ,Vol.196 , pp.1158–1169
[19] Jun Lin, Yanjun Qian, Wentian Cui, Zhanli Miao. “Overlapping and communication policies in product development.” (2010). European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 201, pp.737–750
[20] Andrew Kusiak. “Concurrent Engineering: Automation, Tools and Techniques “ (1992), Wiley-Interscience
[21] Melissa A. Schilling, Charles W. L. Hill. “Managing The new product development process: strategic imperatives,” (1998). Academy of management Executive, Vol.12, No.3, pp.67-81
[22] Sabbagh, K. “Twenty-First Century Jet. Scribner”, (1996). New York.
[23] Stalk, G. and T. M Hout. “ Competing Against Time: How Time-Based Competition is Reshaping Global Markets”, (1990), Free Press, New York, Collier MacMillan London
[24] Stefan H. Thomke.” Experimentation matters: unlocking the potential of new technologies for innovation.” (2003), Harvard Business School Press, pp.307
[25] Swink, Morgan “A Tutorial on Implementing Concurrent Engineering in New Product Development Programs.” (1998), Journal of Operations Management 16: 103-116.
[26] Takeuchi, H., I. Nonaka. ”The new product development game.”(1986).Harvard Bus. Rev., Vol. 64, pp.137-146.
[27] Thomas A. Roemer , Reza Ahmadi “ Concurrent Crashing and Overlapping in Product Development.“(2004).Operation Research, Vol.52, No.4, pp.606–622
[28] Thomas A. Roemer , Reza Ahmadi. And Roberth.wang “Time-Cost Trade-Offs in Overlapped Product Development. “(2000). Operations Research, Vol.48, No.6, pp.858–865
[29] Thomas A. Roemer, Reza Ahmadi “Models for concurrent product and process design. ”, (2010). European Journal of Operational Research , Vol.203, pp.601–613
[30] Thomke, S., Bell, D.E. “Sequential testing in product development.” (2001). Management Science, Vol.47, NO(2), pp.308–323.
[31] Thomke, S.H. “Experimentation Matters: Unlocking the Potential of New Technologies for Innovation.” ( 2003). Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
[32] Viswanathan Krishnan, Steven D. Eppinger, Daniel E. Whitney. “A Model-Based Framework to Overlap Product Development Activities.” (1997). Management Science, Vol. 43, No. 4, Frontier Research in Manufacturing and Logistics , pp. 437-451
[33] Yanjun Qian, Min Xie , Thong Ngee Goh , Jun Lin. “Optimal testing strategies in overlapped design process. ”, (2010). European Journal of Operational Research , Vol.206, pp.131–143
[34] 張鴻錦。台灣TFT-LCD面板產業應用同步工程對新產品開發績效影響之研究 (碩士論文,輔仁大學,2007)。全國博碩士論文資訊網。
[35] 陳金昇。同步工程於新產品開發之應用-以TFT-LCD PANEL個案為例
(碩士論文,逢甲大學,2006)。全國博碩士論文資訊網。
[36]
鄧家駒。「風險管理」(2005),台北市:華泰文化。
[37] 戴亞翔。「TFT-LCD面板的驅動與設計。」(2006),台北:五南書局。第149-153頁。
[38] 簡禎富。 「決策分析與管理-全面決策品質提升之架構與方法」(2009),台北市:雙葉書廊。
[39] 顧鴻壽、周本達、陳密、張德安、樊雨心、周宜衡。「平面面板顯示器基本概論」(2004)。臺北縣:高立出版。
[40] 王凱生。「訂單滿足流程與可允諾量分配模式 - 以 TFT-LCD 產業為例」,(碩士論文,清華大學,2007)。全國博碩士論文資訊網。
[41] 林威旭、黃乾怡,「運用同步工程改善新產品專案開發作業流程-以Battery Pack 為例」(2006)。中華民國品質學會第42 屆年會暨第12 屆全國品質管理研討會。