近幾年來，越南與台灣之間的交流日益增加，台灣為了提升經濟發展、文化交流以及吸引人才等目的，在教育政策上提供了培養人才的計劃，以此吸引更多的越南年輕學生來臺追求學業的夢想。然而由於在高等教育攻讀的學生人數增長的幅度越來越高，閱讀技能對於攻讀高等教育的學生來說就扮演了重要的角色。為了完成學業上的要求，研究生需要大量閱讀學術論文，對於一個中文母語者來說，閱讀學術論文在學習研究上已經是一大挑戰，而對一個以中文為第二語言的學生來說難度更是加倍。因此，強化非母語學生中文學術論文的閱讀策略也成為華語教學的重要課題之一。然而目前為止，針對中文非母語研究生閱讀中文學術論文時採用的閱讀策略的相關研究相當的稀少，因此本研究以在台灣就讀的越南研究生為研究對象，透過有聲思考和深度訪談的方法來蒐集和觀察越南研究生在閱讀中文學術論文時所採用的策略，並加以討論。
在研究結果中發現越南研究生在閱讀中文學術論文時所使用到的「局部性策略」、「全面性策略」和「認知知識」共有3種。使用最多的三種策略為「對文章内容做出反應」、「監視閱讀速度和閱讀行為」以及「確定閱讀內容之重點」。詞彙、字體、文體以及背景知識不足也成為越南學生在閱讀中文學術論文時的障礙，為了解決閱讀的障礙他們採用「使用生詞表或詞典」、「監視閱讀速度和閱讀行為」、「使用推論或做結論」、「將不懂的字詞或短語圈起來」以及「詢問」等策略來處理閱讀上遇到的障礙。此外，「漢越詞」的使用也是越南研究生在閱讀中文學術論文的優勢。
本論文期望藉由研究越南研究生在閱讀中文學術論文時所使用的策略，能夠揭曉越南研究生在閱讀中文學術論文時的閱讀策略使用狀況，以此可以提升越南研究生在閱讀中文學術論文時的效率並且可以成為日後研究越南學生及學術論文類型的閱讀策略的相關領域的依據和參考。

In recent years, the exchange between Vietnam and Taiwan has been increasing. Taiwan has implemented talent cultivation programs in its education policies to enhance economic development, and cultural exchange, and attract more young Vietnamese students to pursue their academic dreams in Taiwan. However, as the number of students pursuing higher education continues to rise, reading skills play a crucial role for these students. In order to complete academic requirements, graduate students are required to read a significant number of academic papers. While reading academic papers presents a substantial challenge for native Chinese speakers in the context of research and learning, the difficulty is amplified for students whose second language is Chinese. As a result, strengthening the reading strategies of Chinese academic papers for non-native-speaking students has also become one of the important topics. However, there is a scarcity of research on the reading strategies employed by foreign graduate students when reading Chinese papers. Therefore, this study focuses on Vietnamese graduate students studying in Taiwan, and to collect and observe the strategies used by Vietnamese graduate students in reading Chinese papers through the method of thinking aloud and in-depth interviews. These strategies will then be subject to discussion and analysis.
In the results of the study, it was found that there are three types of "Local strategies", " Global Strategies " and " Knowledge of Cognition " used by Vietnamese graduate students when reading Chinese academic papers. The three most commonly used strategies by Vietnamese graduate students when reading Chinese papers are "reacting to the text ", " monitoring reading pace and reading behavior" and "identifying the main idea." Insufficient vocabulary, fonts, styles, and background knowledge are also barriers for Vietnamese students when reading Chinese papers.
In order to solve reading difficulties they will express the use of gloss " monitors reading pace and reading behavior ", " uses inference or draws conclusions ", " identifies, through circling, underlining, or placing an arrow, words/ phrases not understood " and "ask" strategies to deal with barriers of reading. Besides, the use of "Chinese-Vietnamese words" is also an advantage for Vietnamese graduate students in reading Chinese papers.
This thesis expects to study the strategies used by Vietnamese graduate students when reading Chinese papers, it can reveal the status of Vietnamese graduate students' reading strategies when reading Chinese papers, so as to improve the efficiency of Vietnamese graduate students in reading Chinese papers and it can be the basis and reference for future research on the reading strategies of Vietnamese students and the types of papers in related fields.

中文參考文獻
文崇一、楊國樞（2000）。訪問調查法。社會及行為科學研究法下冊。台北：東華。
方小兵（2012）。英語學術論文文體特徵和語言風格。福建教育學院學報，第13期，頁102-105。
方淑華(2021)。新冠病毒疫情下實體轉線上華語課程實施之行政面向探究。華語文教學研究, 18(3), 107-139。
王吉亮、鄭惠卿 (1993)。論文寫作學。北京：經濟科學。
王如音 (2008)。不同程度華裔學生之閱讀策略研究。國立臺灣師範大學，台北市。
代憲玲 (2015)。越南留學生漢語閱讀策略調查研究。雲南師範大學。
安小蘭 (2009)。學術論文的文體特點。新聞與寫作(05)，頁89-91。
吳欣穎 (2013)。針對華語中級學習者閱讀策略教學之行動研究-以韓國學生為例。中原大學。
杜雯華 (2000)。美籍學生中文閱讀過程的策略研究。國立臺灣師範大學，台北市。
林采薇 (2017)。華語精熟度、閱讀策略使用頻率與先備知識對華語學習者閱讀華語學術文章的影響。國立清華大學，新竹市。
邵寶誼 (2006)。日籍學習者於閱讀中猜詞策略使用之研究。國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。
信世昌 (2001)。華語文閱讀策略之教程發展與研究。台北市，師大書苑。
袁方、林萬億（2002）。社會研究方法。台北：五南。
馬橋 (2018)。土耳其留學生漢語閱讀策略調查研究。廈門大學。
張治國（2003）。學術論文寫作“六忌”。武警工程學院學報（03），頁58-61。
張毓佩 (2020)。漢語學習者中文學術閱讀認知過程的個案研究。華東師範大學。
彭玉君 (2011)。中級華語學生閱讀策略調查與策略教學成效之個案研究-以越南學生為例。中原大學。
曾祥芹、張復琮（1992）。文體閱讀法。河南:教育。
黃營杉和汪志堅（2002）。研究方法。華泰文化。
葉德明與陳純音 (1998)。外籍學生中文閱讀策略之研究I。國科會研究計畫。
裴富公 (2019)。越南大學生漢語閱讀策略運用調查研究。國立臺南大學，台南市。
劉心瑜 (2016)。台灣研究生英語學術期刊閱讀歷程。國立交通大學，新竹市。
潘淑滿 (2003)。質性研究－理論與運用。台北：心理出版社。
禤勝修 (2021)。學術論文基本特徵的文本呈現。科技傳播，13(24)，頁60-63。
戴浩一（2021）。建基於漢字與漢語結構的中文二語閱讀理論。臺大華語文學習與科技，創刊號，頁13-35。
謝羽涵（2017）。研究生紙本書與電子書閱讀態度、閱讀行為及閱讀策略研究。國立臺灣師範大學，台北市。
羅婷 (2013)。以華語為外語的學習者的閱讀歷程研究-以三位良好的華語閱讀者為例。文藻外語學院，高雄市。
蘇玲巧 (2012)。外籍生華語文閱讀策略之研究。國立屏東教育大學，屏東縣。
英文參考文獻
Aarnoutse, C., & Schellings, G. (2003). Learning reading strategies by triggering reading motivation.Educational Studies, 29(4), 387-409.
Anderson, R. C., & Pichert, J. W. (1978). Recall of previously unrecallable information fol-lowing a shift in perspective. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior,17(1), 1-12.
Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cam-bridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Block, E. (1986). The comprehension strategies of second language readers. Tesol quarter-ly,20(3), 463-494.
Block, E. L. (1992). See how they read: Comprehension monitoring of L1 and L2 readers. TESOL quarterly,26(2), 319-343.
Bransford, J. D., & Johnson, M. K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of verbal learning and verbal be-havior,11(6), 717-726.
Brown, A. L., & Lawton, S. C. (1977). The feeling of knowing experience in educable re-tarded children. Developmental Psychology,13(4), 364.
Cheng, C. K. (1999). The use of think-aloud protocols in investigation of second language reading.Hwa Kang Journal of English Language & Literature, (5), 3-29.
Dansereau, D. F. (1985). Learning strategy research, thinking and learning skills.VI Relation Instruction to Research, Hillsdale, New Jersey.
Dhieb-Henia, N. (2003). Evaluating the effectiveness of metacognitive strategy training for reading research articles in an ESP context. English for Specific purposes,22(4), 387-417.
DuBay, W. H. (2007). Smart Language: Readers, Readability, and the Grading of Text.
Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological review,87(3), 215.
Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1998). How to study thinking in everyday life: Contrasting think-aloud protocols with descriptions and explanations of thinking. Mind, Culture, and Activity,5(3), 178-186.
Evans, S., & Green, C. (2007). Why EAP is necessary: A survey of Hong Kong tertiary stu-dents. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6(1), 3-17.
Everson, M., & Ke, C. (1997). An inquiry into the reading strategies of intermediate and ad-vanced learners of Chinese as a foreign language. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association,32(1), 1-20.
Fry, E. (2002). Readability versus leveling. The reading teacher,56(3), 286-291.
Gagne, R. (1985). The conditions of learning and theory of instruction Robert Gagné. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart ja Winston.
Garner, R. (1982). Verbal-report data on reading strategies. Journal of Reading Behav-ior,14(2), 159-167.
Goodman, k. (1967). Reading: a psycholinguistic guessing game–literacy research and in-struction. Journal of the reading specialist, 126-135.
Goodman, K. S. (1970). Psycholinguistic universals in the reading process. Visible Lan-guage,4(2), 103-110.
Gough, P. B., Kavanagh, J. F., & Mattingly, I. G. (1972). One second of reading. Cambridge: MIT Press, 331-358.
Guthrie, J. T., & Klauda, S. L. (2014). Effects of classroom practices on reading comprehen-sion, engagement, and motivations for adolescents. Reading research quarterly,49(4), 387-416.
Hosenfeld, C. (1977). A preliminary investigation of the reading strategies of successful and nonsuccessful second language learners. System, 5(2), 110-123.
Hudson, T. (1982). The effects of induced schemata on the “short circuit” in l2 reading: non‐decoding factors in l2 reading performance 1. Language learning, 32(1), 1-33.
Jordan, R. R. (1997). English for academic purposes: A guide and resource book for teach-ers. Cambridge University Press.
Klare, G. R. (1963). Measurement of readability.
Kletzien, S. B. (1991). Strategy use by good and poor comprehenders reading expository text of differing levels. Reading research quarterly, 67-86.
Lee, C.D., & Spratley, A. (2010). Reading in the Disciplines: The Challenges of Adolescent Literacy. Final Report from Carnegie Corporation of New York's Council on Advanc-ing Adolescent Literacy. Carnegie Corporation of New York.
Lee‐Thompson, L. C. (2008). An investigation of reading strategies applied by American learners of Chinese as a foreign language. Foreign language annals, 41(4), 702-721.
Levine, A., Ferenz, O., & Reves, T. (2000). EFL academic reading and modern technology: How can we turn our students into independent critical readers. Tesl-Ej, 4(4), 1-9.
Li, S., & Munby, H. (1996). Metacognitive strategies in second language academic reading: A qualitative investigation. English for specific purposes, 15(3), 199-216.
Miller, P. H., & Bigi, L. (1979). The development of children's understanding of attention. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly of Behavior and Development, 25(4), 235-250.
Mokhtari, K., & Sheorey, R. (2002). Measuring ESL students' awareness of reading strate-gies. Journal of developmental education, 25(3), 2-11.
Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving (Vol. 104, No. 9). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-hall.
Nuttall, C. (1996). Teaching reading skills in a foreign language. Heinemann, 361 Hanover Street, Portsmouth, NH 03801-3912.
Ostler, S. E. (1980). A survey of academic needs for advanced ESL. Tesol Quarterly, 489-502.
Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies What every teacher should know. Heinle & heinle Publishers.
Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of construc-tively responsive reading.
Pritchard, R. (1990). The effects of cultural schemata on reading processing strategies. Reading research quarterly, 273-295.
Rowe, H. A. (1985). Problem solving and intelligence. Psychology Press.
Rumelhart, D. E. (1980). On evaluating story grammars.
Saengpakdeejit, R., & Intaraprasert, C. (2014). Reading Strategies in Foreign Language Ac-ademic Reading: A Qualitative Investigation. Theory & Practice in Language Stud-ies,4(12).
Sohail, S. (2015). Academic reading strategies used by Leeds Metropolitan University grad-uates: A case study. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 2(2).
Trudell, B. (2019). Reading in the classroom and society: An examination of “reading cul-ture” in African contexts. International Review of Education,65(3), 427-442.
Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (1997). Relations of children's motivation for reading to the amount and breadth or their reading. Journal of educational psychology, 89(3), 420.
Young, D. J. (1993). Processing strategies of foreign language readers: Authentic and edited input. Foreign Language Annals, 26(4), 451-468.
Yüksel, İ., & Yüksel, İ. (2012). Metacognitive awareness of academic reading strategies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 894-898.
網路資源
行政院（2022年09月13日）。〈南向政策〉。
https://www.ey.gov.tw/achievement/4FA9200AE4958785
主題式互動統計圖表（2022年09月15日）。〈大專校院境外學生概況〉。教育部。
https://stats.moe.gov.tw/statedu/chart.aspx?pvalue=36
Tocfl華語文能力測驗（2022年09月15日）。〈華語文能力測驗命題設計概述〉。
https://tocfl.edu.tw/assets/files/2022presentation.pdf