摘要
本研究是以國小五年級學童共 30 位,將教學法分為傳統便利貼與 Group Scribbles 便利貼,進行同步多媒體在 Group Scribbles 學習平台上對學生學習 體積與容積成效的研究與探討,研究結果可以發現:
1. Group Scribbles 多媒體影音模組融入這次的體積與容積實驗教學環境,能明顯 提升中低成就學生的學習表現,尤其是能讓學生拉近彼此的學習成就差距。
2. 在課堂實施 Group Scribbles 便利貼教學時,教學過程中運用電子和 E 化設備 來與學生進行同步多媒體的互動教學,確實可以讓學生激發討論的動機、學習更 加地積極互賴、學生的責任心加重、社會技巧的提升。
3. 以影音教材類型的學習最能直接引導學生啟發思考,讓學生可以不用倚靠老 師的步驟講解,就能放輕鬆地上數學課,享受分享的樂趣。
4. 影像題目的解題過程中,相較於靜態文字或是文字圖片的形式,讓學生感受 到較多的熱情與親切感。

Abstract
This research was based elementary school of the fifth graders 30 students in the hsinchu city. Research and discussion of these students learn the 「Volume and Capacity」unit with mathematic teaching method into traditional sticky notes and Group Scribbles software as the fifth graders in the hsinchu city. The results were as follows:
1. When Group Scribbles multimedia audio and video modules into the Volume and Capacity of teaching environment, we can found it can improve the academic performance of low achieving students, enable students to narrow their academic achievement gap especially.
2. The teaching process in the use of electronic by equipment electronically to synchronized multimedia interactive teaching and learning with students in the class using Group Scribbles stick notes, we found it aroused discussion of the motivation、 learn more positive interdependence、students increase their responsibility and enhancement their social skills.
3. The audio-visual teaching materials of the learning types is the best able to guide students thought-provoking, let this students cannot rely by the teacher's steps to explain and able to relax and enjoy the pleasure of sharing in the math class.
4. When students answer these math questions, we found the process with video format can let their feel more passion and intimacy rather static text or the text format of picture.

參考文獻
一. 中文部分
教育部(民90)。中小學資訊教育總藍圖。台北:教育部。
南一書局(民 99)。國民小學數學第九冊課本、教師手冊。台北:南一書局事業股份有限公司。
潭立志 (民 99)。資訊技術與小學幾何基礎知識進行整合的初步探討。民 100 年2 月 15 日,取至 http://jyw.es.e21.cn/jcjy/ShowArticle.asp?ArticleID=11853
郭明德(2009)。正面管教法‥建構正向師生關係之有效策略。國立台灣體育大
學(台中)。研習資訊。 余志鴻(2006)。數位元學習互動模式對學習者資訊技能學習成效與態度之影響。
國立臺灣師範大學資訊教育研究所,碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
李慶源(2005)。學習網站的溝通型態:內在互動、人際互動與外在互動。未出版碩士,國立中央大學網路學習科技研究所,桃園縣。
林寶山(1998)。教學原理與技巧。台北:五南。
李原富(2009)。不同多媒體教學對四年級月相概念學習成就與學習動機之研究。未出版碩士,國立臺南大學材料科學系自然科學教育碩士班,台南市。
侯麗惠(2007)。不同訊息回饋策略對高低能力學生在合作學習情境下技能學習 成效之研究-以太極拳技能為例。未出版碩士論文,國立嘉義大學,體育與健康休閒研究所,嘉義。
謝駿榮(2010)。運用GS平台設計融入訊息回饋的「縱橫數謎」遊戲於加減計算能力之研究。國立新竹教育大學數位學習科技研究所碩士論文,未出版,新竹。
陳德懷(2010)。數位學習的四個問題。民 99 年 11 月 19 日,取至 http://www.csie.ndhu.edu.tw/webv3/cht/speech/NDHU20101119.pdf
何詩欽(1999)。多媒體教材在行動載具上不同呈現方式之學習成效探討-以高一生活科技為例。國立交通大學在職專班科技與數位學習學程碩士論文,未出版,新竹。
黃台珠、熊召弟、王美芬、余曉清、靳知勤、段曉琳、熊同鑫(譯) ,“促進理解之科學教學:人本建構取向觀點”,心理,台北市,2002.
蔡盈欣(2008)。應用電腦多媒體融入教學對國中生呼吸單元學習成就影響之研究。未出版碩士,國立臺灣師範大學生命科學系在職進修碩士班,台北市。
邱俊宏(2004)。多媒體電腦輔助教學對國小學童學習線對稱圖形成效之研究。未出版碩士,屏東師範學院數理教育研究所,屏東縣。
林儀惠(2008)。互動式電子白板在國小數學教學之探討-以國小數學領域五年級面積單元為例。亞洲大學資訊工程學系碩士論文,未出版,台中市。
彭聖淵 (2010)。資訊融入國小數學科教學效益之探究-以康軒版國小五年級等 值分數單元為例。未出版碩士,國立臺中教育大學數學教育學系在職進修教學碩士學位班,台中市。90
黃家珮(2009)。應用CAISM及ISM提供國小數學教師實行團體補救教學之參照。 未出版碩士,國立新竹教育大學人資處數學教育碩士班,新竹市。
劉彥宏(2008)。利用SVM結合多重貝氏網路之適性學習系統研發-以國小數學領 域分數的乘法為例。未出版碩士,亞洲大學資訊工程學系碩士班,台中縣。
蔡文龍(2008)。國小數學網路電腦化適性測驗系統之建置與研究─以國小三年 級分數單元為例。未出版碩士,嶺東科技大學數位媒體設計研究所,台中市。
陳彥至(2008)。電子白板於國小數學科教學之行動研究。未出版碩士,國立臺灣師範大學資訊教育學系,台北市。
潘毅芳(2008)。多媒體融入國小數學「速度」單元教學模式之探究。未出版碩士,國立臺北教育大學教育傳播與科技研究所,台北市。
劉正山(2008)。交互白板環境下國小數學領域教學設計的互動研究。未出版碩士,國立臺北教育大學教育傳播與科技研究所,台北市。
洪志宏(2007)。互動式數位學習網站在國小數學因數倍數教學應用與學習成效之研究。未出版碩士,雲林科技大學資訊管理系碩士班,雲林縣。
林信明(2007)。國小數學領域「擴分、約分」補救教學系統發展與評估。未出版碩士,國立臺南大學數位學習科技學系,台南市。
陳正二(2006)。國小數學領域四年級幾何能力指標之電腦適性測驗編製及動畫補救教學之應用。未出版碩士,國立臺中教育大學教育測驗統計研究所,台中市。 黃士騰(2006)。網路教學課程實做之行動研究-以國小數學科因數單元補救教學為例。未出版碩士,國立嘉義大學數學教育研究所,嘉義市。
鄭皓元(2006)。資訊融入國小數學科教學效益之探究-以六年級面積概念為例。未出版碩士,國立臺中教育大學數學教育學系,台中市。
二. 英文部分
Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, C. C., Kulik, J. A., & Morgan, M. (1991). The instructional effects of feedback in test-like events. Review of EducationalResearch, 61(2), 213-238.
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. L. (1974). Working Memory, In G.A. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation: advances in research and theory, 8,pp. 47–89, New York: Academic Press.
Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working Memory. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
Baddeley, A. D. (1992). Working memory. American Association for the Advancement of Science, 255, p556-559.
Bassi, L., Cheney, S., & Van Buren, M. (1997). Training Industry Trends1997.American Society for Training and Development, Alexandria, Virginia.
Baddeley, A. D. (1998). Human memory: Theory and practice (2nd ed). Boston:Allyn & Bacon.91
Baddeley, A. D. (2003). Working Memory: Looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4 (10): 829-839.
Bera, S., & Liu, M. (2006). Cognitive Tools, Individual Differences, and Group Processing as Mediating Factors in a Hypermedia Environment. Computers in Human Behavior. 22(2), 295-319.
Collins, A., & Stevens, A. L. (1983). A Cognitive Theory of Inquiry Teaching. In C. M.
Chamber, J. A., & Sprecher, J. W. (1983). Computer-assisted instruction: Its use in the classroom. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920. New York: Teachers College Press.
Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive Load Theory and the Format of Instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8 (4), 293–332.
Charles, C. M. (2004). Building classroom discipline (7th ed.).Allyn & Bacan. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (1996). Looking at technology in context: A framework for understanding technology and education research. In D. C. Berliner& R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 807-840). New York:Macmillan.
Damarin, F., & Damarin, S. K. (1983). Response sets: implications of research on psychological testing for interactive computer-based instructional. Journal of computer based instruction, 9(4), pp.124-130.
Zhang, D. (2010). Study on the Teaching Model Based on Multimedia and Network Environment. International Education Studies, 1(3), 161-164.
Edwards, C. H. (2004). Classroom discipline and management (4th ed.). New York: Macmillan.
Gagne, R. M., (1985). The Conditions of Learning and Theory of Instruction. New York: CBS College Publishing.
Kulhavy, R. W., & Stock, W. A. (1989). Feedback in written instruction: The place of response certitude. Educational Psychology Review, 1(4), 279-308.
Jones, V. F., & Jones, L. S. (2005). Comprehensive Classroom management: Creating positive learning environments for all students (5th ed.). Needham Height: Allyn, Bacon & Schuster Company.
Lin, H. C. (2004). The Collaborative Learning of Teachers and Students: The Action Research on Constructing A Cooperative Community in Integrative Curriculum. Fo-Guang University-Humanity ans Social Science Division, 5,111-146.
Mayer, R. E. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist, 32, 1-19.
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (1998). A split-attention effect in multimedia learning:92 Evidence for dual processing systems in working memory. Educational Psychology, 90, 312–320.
Mayer, R. E., Moreno, R., Boire, M., & Vagge, S. (1999). Maximizing Constructivist Learning From Multimedia Communications by Minimizing Cognitive Load, Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), 638-643.
Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press. Nooteboom, B. (2000). Learning by interaction: Absorptive capacity, cognitive distance and governance, Journal of Management and Governance, 4(1-2):69-92.
Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: a dual coding approach. Oxford. England:Oxford University Press.
Paivio, A. (1990). Mental representations: a dual coding approach (2nd ed.). NY:Oxford University Press.
Pass, F. G. W., & Van Merrienboer, J. J. G. (1994). Variability of worked examples and transfer of geometrical problem solving:A cognitive load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(1), 122-133.
Reigeluth C. M. (1987). Instructional theories in action: Lessons illustrating selected theories and models. Hillsdale, NJ; Lawrence Erlbaum, 247-248.
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning, Cognitive Science, 12, 257-285.
Steinberg, E. R. (1984). Teaching computer to teach. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Savage, Terry, M., & Karla E. Vogel (1996). Multimedia. College Teaching, 44 (4), 127-132.
Wittrock, M. C. (1989). Generative processes of comprehension. Educational Psychologist, 24, 345-376.
Wragg, E. C. (2001). Classroom management in the secondary school. New York: Routledge.93